Your case is filed under seal. Your employer is not notified.

Free reviewNo fee unless we recoverCases nationwide

The Whistleblower AdvocatesA practice of Kang Haggerty LLCConfidential line(833) 310-3147

Laboratory Fraud: Medical Necessity, Panels and Referral Payments

Short answer

Laboratory fraud includes billing tests that were not medically necessary, unbundling panels to bill components separately, running reflex testing without physician orders, and paying physicians or marketers for specimen referrals in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute.

Medical necessity and standing orders

Federal programs pay for tests that are reasonable and necessary for a specific patient. Standing orders that trigger the same expensive panel for every patient regardless of presentation do not meet that standard.

The pattern shows in the ordering data. A physician whose every patient receives an identical extensive panel, or a laboratory whose test mix is uniform across very different clinical populations, is not exercising individualized judgment.

The recurring schemes

Laboratory economics reward volume and test count, and the fraud follows.

  • Unbundling panels to bill components at a higher total
  • Adding tests to an order the physician did not request
  • Reflex testing performed automatically without a physician decision
  • Medically unnecessary genetic and pharmacogenomic panels
  • Excessive definitive drug testing where presumptive testing was sufficient
  • Waiving copays and deductibles to secure referral volume
  • Paying processing or handling fees to referring physicians above fair market value
  • Placing phlebotomists in physician offices who perform practice work

Kickbacks are the other half

Laboratory cases very often pair a billing theory with an Anti-Kickback theory, because the volume had to come from somewhere.

Payments structured as processing fees, specimen collection fees, medical directorships, or free equipment and staffing to referring practices are the recurring mechanisms. Since 2010 a claim resulting from a kickback is itself a false claim, so the two theories reinforce each other.

Telehealth-driven ordering

A large share of recent laboratory enforcement involves orders generated by telehealth entities paid per order rather than for care, particularly for cancer genomic panels and pharmacogenomic testing.

Laboratory staff see the concentration: large volumes of identical high-value orders arriving from a small number of ordering entities whose patients have no other relationship with any provider.

Frequently asked questions

Are standing orders illegal?

Not inherently. They become a problem where they produce testing without individualized medical necessity for the patient billed.

Is paying a processing fee to a referring physician allowed?

Fair market value payment for a genuine service can be lawful. Payments that exceed fair market value or that vary with referral volume implicate the Anti-Kickback Statute.

I am a lab technician. Would I know enough to bring a case?

Frequently yes. Technicians see the ordering patterns, the reflex protocols, and which accounts drive volume, which is exactly the specific information the statute rewards.

The attorneys who handle these cases

Related reading

See what we have recovered for whistleblowers

Talk to a whistleblower attorney before you report

A conversation costs nothing and is confidential. We will tell you honestly whether what you have describes a case, and what the first-to-file rule means for your timing.

Call (833) 310-3147 for a free confidential review