DFARS clause 252.204-7012 requires Department of Defense (DoD) contractors to:
Safeguard Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)
Implement security controls specified in NIST SP 800-171
Provide adequate incident reporting
Use FedRAMP Moderate equivalent cloud environments for CUI
Submit self-assessed scores to the SPRS database
False claims of compliance with these obligations can expose the government to cyber risk—and expose contractors to massive liability.
Contractors commit DFARS compliance fraud when they:
Submit SPRS scores without implementing required NIST 800-171 controls
Claim to have secure cloud storage (FedRAMP Moderate), but use commercial systems like Google Drive or Microsoft OneDrive
Fabricate or reuse outdated System Security Plans (SSPs) and Plans of Action and Milestones (POA&Ms)
Fail to report breaches, unauthorized access, or insider threats
Retaliate against staff who raise cybersecurity concerns
If a contractor knows it isn't compliant but says it is to win or keep a DoD contract, that’s fraud under the False Claims Act.
The DoD relies on contractors to secure military research, weapon systems, and personnel data. A single false attestation can compromise entire supply chains.
You’re not just blowing the whistle for personal justice—you’re defending national security.
In the Decker v. University of Pennsylvania lawsuit, a senior information officer revealed that:
Penn reused generic compliance templates
Stored CUI in non-FedRAMP cloud platforms
Lacked proper risk assessments and internal audits
Still submitted compliance certifications to DoD for contract eligibility
Despite knowing it didn’t meet DFARS/NIST requirements, Penn continued to receive federal funding—until a whistleblower stepped forward.
In a separate case, United States ex rel. Doe v. Raytheon, a former engineering director disclosed that Raytheon:
Gave full admin privileges to all users on the “DarkNet” platform
Continued to use pirated software for defense systems
Knew it wasn’t compliant with NIST 800-171
Chose to lie rather than delay submission or seek a waiver
Retaliated against internal employees trying to correct the violations
These actions allegedly defrauded the U.S. government out of billions and created enormous cyber risk.
Potential whistleblowers include:
Cybersecurity engineers
CIOs and CISOs
IT and network administrators
Compliance officers
DoD subcontractors
University research staff
Former employees with access to internal documentation
If you’ve been pressured to sign a compliance attestation you knew was false—or saw one submitted despite known gaps—you likely qualify.
To report DFARS fraud effectively, you’ll want to gather:
Internal communications (emails, chats, memos)
Screenshots of non-compliant systems or SPRS entries
SSPs or POA&Ms showing missing or incomplete controls
Internal audit reports or meeting notes
Documentation of retaliatory behavior after raising concerns
Statements of Work or contract language referencing DFARS clause 252.204-7012
The more documentation you have, the more viable your False Claims Act case becomes.
If your whistleblower case results in a successful recovery, you can receive:
15% to 25% of the government’s recovery (if the DOJ joins your case)
Up to 30% if the government doesn’t intervene and you win on your own
Damages for retaliation (e.g., back pay, reinstatement, attorneys' fees)
Whistleblower rewards often reach into the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars depending on the contract value involved.
The False Claims Act includes powerful protections for whistleblowers. If you’ve faced:
Termination
Demotion
Harassment
Denied promotions or projects
…you can sue for damages under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h).
Even if you're still employed, you can report confidentially and under seal with the help of a specialized attorney.
Here’s how the process works:
Confidential Consultation
Speak with a False Claims Act attorney to assess your case.
Collect and Preserve Evidence
Secure key documents, emails, and reports legally.
File a Sealed Complaint
Your attorney will file a complaint with the Department of Justice under seal—meaning it’s not publicly disclosed.
DOJ Review and Investigation
The DOJ will investigate and decide whether to intervene.
Litigation or Settlement
If successful, the government recovers money—and you get a share.
False Claims Act cases based on DFARS violations are complex and involve both federal contract law and cybersecurity frameworks. A qualified cybersecurity whistleblower law firm will help you:
Maximize your recovery
Avoid retaliation
Comply with whistleblower rules
Navigate sealed court filings
Present your case persuasively to the DOJ
If you know your company is lying about DFARS compliance, don’t stay silent. The longer fraud continues, the greater the risk to national security—and the less likely you are to be the first to report it. Contact The Whistleblower Advocates today.
Be the one who steps up. The government will thank you—and so will your future.
We serve clients throughout the Delaware Valley including, but not limited to, those in the following localities: Pennsylvania including Berks County, Bucks County, Chester County, Delaware County, Montgomery County, and Philadelphia.
Contact Us | The Whistleblower Advocates
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Copyright © The Whistleblower Advocates. All Rights Reserved